Module Code: H9IBRP
Long Title Industry Based Research Project
Title Copy Of Industry Based Research Project
Module Level: LEVEL 9
EQF Level: 7
EHEA Level: Second Cycle
Credits: 25
Module Coordinator: Simon Caton
Module Author: Simon Caton
Departments: School of Computing
Specifications of the qualifications and experience required of staff  
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this module the learner will be able to:
# Learning Outcome Description
LO1 Analyse, select and implement appropriate research methods and techniques
LO2 Research and critically analyse the state of the art of a problem domain
LO3 Propose, architect and implement an ICT solution related to the programme area
LO4 Evaluate the solution based on identified measures
LO5 Investigate potential future research possibilities
LO6 Present and defend the research findings through a viva, artefact/product demo and research paper style report.
Dependencies
Module Recommendations

This is prior learning (or a practical skill) that is required before enrolment on this module. While the prior learning is expressed as named NCI module(s) it also allows for learning (in another module or modules) which is equivalent to the learning specified in the named module(s).
No recommendations listed
Co-requisite Modules
No Co-requisite modules listed
Entry requirements  
 

Module Content & Assessment

Indicative Content
Literature Review
The literature review should demonstrate evidence of independent research critically analysing the potential of an application / idea and provide insights into how it can be implemented and evaluated. This may build upon the work conducted in Semester 2 as part of Research in Computing module, but will have to be updated and revised based on feedback from supervisors.
Project Specifications
The project specifications describe the research background that includes the research question and definition of research variables.
Solution Development
Learners develop a solution that addresses the research question. This may involve the development of an application prototype, the design of an algorithm, the implementation of an innovative service or component of a system.
Evaluation
A comprehensive evaluation must be conducted by each learner using multiple strategies, example; an algorithm may be benchmarked by performance specific metrics whilst an internet application or mobile application may be evaluated using suitable usability testing techniques. Statistical tools should be used to critically evaluate and assess the experimental research outputs and levels of significance.
Conclusion and Future Work
Learners must arrive at a conclusion from their research question as defined within the position paper. A detailed future work section must be included showing the learners understanding of their own research conducted
Viva
The viva shall involve a presentation of the research work carried out and a demonstration of the final results to at least two academic examiners. A demonstration of the developed artefact/product will be required.
Industry Placement Report
In order to be able to monitor student progress in the FinTech related business environment, students have also to produce an industry placement report consisting of a qualitative description of the research designated environment and a description of their activities, as well as monthly progress reports. The completed report must be signed off by the industry supervisor.
Assessment Breakdown%
Coursework100.00%

Assessments

Full Time

Coursework
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 10
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Research paper style report: Literature review
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 10
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Research paper style report: Project specification
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 20
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Research paper style report: Artefact/Product evaluation
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 10
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Research paper style report: Conclusion and future work
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 5
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Research paper style report: Referencing and references
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 30
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Artefact/Project Development
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 5
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
User configuration manual
Assessment Type: Project % of total: 10
Assessment Date: n/a Outcome addressed: 6
Non-Marked: No
Assessment Description:
Viva
No End of Module Assessment
No Workplace Assessment
Reassessment Requirement
Coursework Only
This module is reassessed solely on the basis of re-submitted coursework. There is no repeat written examination.

NCIRL reserves the right to alter the nature and timings of assessment

 

Module Workload

Module Target Workload Hours 0 Hours
Workload: Full Time
Workload Type Workload Description Hours Frequency Average Weekly Learner Workload
Lecturer Supervised Learning No Description 12 Per 15 week block 0.80
Independent Learning Time No Description 488 Per 15 week block 32.53
Total Weekly Contact Hours 0.80
Workload: Part Time
Workload Type Workload Description Hours Frequency Average Weekly Learner Workload
Lecturer Supervised Learning No Description 1 Per 15 week block 0.07
Independent Learning Time No Description 49 Per 15 week block 3.27
Total Weekly Contact Hours 0.07
 

Module Resources

Recommended Book Resources
  • Zobel, J.. (2004), Writing for computer science., 2nd Edition. Springer, Berlin.
  • Berndtsson, M.. (2008), Thesis projects: a guide for learners in computer science and information systems, Springer, London.
  • Chishti, Susanne and Janos Barberis. The FINTECH Book: The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaries, Wiley.
  • Webster, Jane and Richard T Watson. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future:Writing a Literature Review, MIS quarterly.
This module does not have any article/paper resources
Other Resources
Discussion Note: