Module Code: |
H9RCM |
Long Title
|
Risk and Change Management
|
Title
|
Risk and Change Management
|
Module Level: |
LEVEL 9 |
EQF Level: |
7 |
EHEA Level: |
Second Cycle |
Module Coordinator: |
Rejwanul Haque |
Module Author: |
Shauni Hegarty |
Departments: |
School of Computing
|
Specifications of the qualifications and experience required of staff |
PhD/Master’s degree in a computing or cognate discipline. May have industry experience also.
|
Learning Outcomes |
On successful completion of this module the learner will be able to: |
# |
Learning Outcome Description |
LO1 |
Demonstrate expert knowledge of the principles and models of change management, and how these can support the adoption of AI within organisations. |
LO2 |
Comprehend, compare, and contrast governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) for AI and its impacts on traditional information governance. |
LO3 |
Select, assess, and apply best practices to structure AI teams, manage roles and responsibilities, and govern AI projects to drive responsible and ethical outcomes. |
LO4 |
Evaluate and communicate changes related to the organisation and AI. |
Dependencies |
Module Recommendations
This is prior learning (or a practical skill) that is required before enrolment on this module. While the prior learning is expressed as named NCI module(s) it also allows for learning (in another module or modules) which is equivalent to the learning specified in the named module(s).
|
No recommendations listed |
Co-requisite Modules
|
No Co-requisite modules listed |
Entry requirements |
Applicants are required to hold a minimum of a Level 8 honours qualification (2.2 or higher) or equivalent on the National Qualifications Framework in either STEM (e.g., Information Management Systems, Information Technologies, Computer Science, Computer Engineer) or Business (e.g., Business Information Systems, Business Administration, Economics) discipline and a minimum of three years of relevant work experience in industry, ideally but not necessarily, in management. Previous numerical and computer proficiencies should be part of their work experience or formal training. Graduates from disciplines which do not have technical or mathematical problem-solving skills embedded in their programme will need to be able to demonstrate technical or mathematical problem-solving skills in addition to their level 8 programme qualifications (Certifications, Additional Qualifications, Certified Experience and Assessment Tests). All applicants for the programme must provide evidence that they have prior Mathematics and Computing module experience (e.g., via academic transcripts or recognised certification) as demonstrated in one mathematics/statistics module and one computing module or statement of purpose must specify numerical and computing work experience.
NCI also operates a prior experiential learning policy where graduates with lower, or no formal qualifications, currently working in a relevant field, may be considered for the programme.
Applicants must also be able to have their own laptop with the minimum required specification that will be communicated to each applicant through both the admissions and marketing departments.
|
Module Content & Assessment
Indicative Content |
No indicative content |
Assessment Breakdown | % |
Coursework | 100.00% |
AssessmentsFull Time
Coursework |
Assessment Type: |
Formative Assessment |
% of total: |
Non-Marked |
Assessment Date: |
n/a |
Outcome addressed: |
1,2,3,4 |
Non-Marked: |
Yes |
Assessment Description: Formative assessment will be provided on the
in-class individual or group activities. Feedback
will be provided in written or oral format, or online through Moodle. In addition, in class
discussions will be undertaken as part of the
practical approach to learning. |
|
Assessment Type: |
Continuous Assessment |
% of total: |
100 |
Assessment Date: |
n/a |
Outcome addressed: |
1,2,3,4 |
Non-Marked: |
No |
Assessment Description: LO1 – LO4 are achieved in two stages. First,
course content is reviewed, discussed, and
worked out in the form of a framework to solve
a real-life business situation with AI technology.
Secondly, that formulation work is applied to
the problem and a solution is presented,
consolidating learning.
Learners will present technical components of
the solution in a simulated Technical advisory
board and change advisory board following the
change management process. |
|
No End of Module Assessment |
Reassessment Requirement |
Coursework Only
This module is reassessed solely on the basis of re-submitted coursework. There is no repeat written examination.
|
NCIRL reserves the right to alter the nature and timings of assessment
Module Workload
Module Target Workload Hours 0 Hours |
Module Resources
Recommended Book Resources |
---|
-
Marlon Dumas,Marcello La Rosa,Jan Mendling,Hajo A. Reijers. (2019), Fundamentals of Business Process Management, Springer, p.527, [ISBN: 978-3662585856].
-
Tom Taulli. (2020), The Robotic Process Automation Handbook, Apress, p.344, [ISBN: 978-1484257289].
-
Stuart Russell,Peter Norvig. (2019), Artificial Intelligence, Pearson Higher Education, p.1136, [ISBN: 978-0134610993].
-
Nandan Mullakara,Arun Kumar Asokan. Robotic Process Automation Projects, [ISBN: 978-1839217357].
| Supplementary Book Resources |
---|
-
Elijah Falode. The Future of Intelligent Automation, [ISBN: 979-8642979969].
-
Elijah Falode. The Future of Intelligent Automation, [ISBN: 979-8642979969].
-
Walter Surdak. The Care and Feeding of Bots, [ISBN: 979-8610003634].
-
Olivier Boissier,Rafael H. Bordini,Jomi Hubner,Alessandro Ricci. (2020), Multi-Agent Oriented Programming, MIT Press, p.264, [ISBN: 978-0262044578].
| This module does not have any article/paper resources |
---|
Other Resources |
---|
-
Alsheibani, S., Cheung, Y., &
Messom, C.. (2018), Alsheibani, S., Cheung, Y., &
Messom, C., PACIS 2018 Proceedings,
-
https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/37.. (2019), https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/37., California Management Review.
-
California Management Review. (2013), California Management Review, Journal of Product Innovation Management.
-
Chui, M., Harryson, M., Manyika, J.,
Roberts, R., Chung, R., van Heteren, A.,
& Nel, P. (2018), Notes from the AI frontier: Applying AI
for social good., McKinsey Global Institute.,
-
Davenport, T. H.. (2018), From analytics to artificial
intelligence, From analytics to artificial
intelligence.
-
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova,
E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T.,
Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J.,
Eirug, A., & Galanos, V. (. (2011), Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova,
E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T.,
Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J.,
Eirug, A., & Galanos, V. (, Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova,
E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T.,
Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J.,
Eirug, A., & Galanos, V. (.
-
Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S.,
TajMazinani, M. and Mac Feely, S.. (2020), Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S.,
TajMazinani, M. and Mac Feely, S., AI.
-
Khan, A. M. A., Amin, N., & Lambrou,
N. (2010), Drivers and barriers to business
intelligence adoption: A case of
Pakistan., Drivers and barriers to business
intelligence adoption: A case of
Pakistan..
-
Ransbotham, S., Gerbert, P., Reeves, M.,
Kiron, D., & Spira, M.. (2018), Artificial intelligence in business gets
real., MIT Sloan Management Review.,
-
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P.,
& Reeves, M.. (2017), Reshaping business with artificial
intelligence: Closing the gap between
ambition and action, MIT Sloan Management Review.,
-
Shafie, S. B., Siti-Nabiha, A. K., &
Tan, C. L.. (2014), Shafie, S. B., Siti-Nabiha, A. K., &
Tan, C. L.,
|
|